Recurrent Pregnancy Loss - The Benefits of PGD

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) may significantly improve the risk of miscarriage / recurrent pregnancy loss in patients who have had 2 or more first trimester pregnancy losses or have lost a pregnancy due to a chromosomal abnormality. PGD can also decrease the increased risk of miscarriage due to maternal age over 37. Saint Barnabas is a world leader in the PGD technique and research and has a proven success rate.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a new test that can detect genetic abnormalities in embryos before they are implanted into a mother’s womb to prevent the conception of an abnormal pregnancy or child. PGD may be a reasonable option for many patients with recurrent first-trimester miscarriage or a history of a chromosomally abnormal pregnancy. The test can be used to detect aneuploidy.  Aneuploidy is a condition where there are an abnormal number of chromosomes.  Chromosomes are the structures inside a cell that carry our genetic material.  Each embryo should contain 46 chromosomes in each of its cells, 23 from the mother and 23 from the father.  When an embryo has an abnormal number of chromosomes, the embryo may not be able to implant in the uterus, or it may implant and miscarry, or it may develop birth defects.  Down’s syndrome, for example, is a type of aneuploidy caused when an extra chromosome number 21 is present.  Aneuploidy causes 50% to 70% of first-trimester miscarriages.  PGD can significantly reduce the risk of miscarriage and aneuploidy by detecting abnormal numbers of chromosomes in embryos prior to replacement into the mother’s womb.

The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science at Saint Barnabas Medical Center in Livingston, New Jersey, is one of the few centers with significant experience in this technique, and this article reviews the experiences and results there. This article examines the indications, benefits, and limitations of PGD, and demonstrates why it should be considered for women with recurrent miscarriage.

 

PGD TECHNIQUE

As PGD requires the creation of embryos in the laboratory, patients must undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF). This involves ovarian stimulation of multiple egg development using injectable fertility drugs called gonadotropins (Gonal-f, Follistim, Repronex, Pergonal, etc). While the patient is under sedation or anesthesia, the eggs are retrieved by placing a needle through the vaginal wall and into the ovary under ultrasonographic guidance. The eggs are then inseminated with the partner’s sperm in the laboratory. Once fertilization occurs, the embryos are allowed to grow and divide in the laboratory for 3 days, when the embryos should reach the 6- to 8-cell stage. At this point in development, each cell in the embryo is the same, so that analyzing the chromosomes of a single cell should provide information about the chromosomes analyzed for all the cells in the embryo.

An embryo biopsy is performed by creating an opening in the zona pellucida –the “shell” around the embryo - using mechanical means, diluted acid solution, or a laser. A single blastomere or cell is removed through this opening using gentle suction and a micropipette. The biopsy is undertaken using a special microscope with delicate micromanipulators. The cell is then attached to a glass slide, and the embryo is returned to an incubator to await the results of the biopsy.

            The diagnosis of aneuploidy uses fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). This technique uses  small pieces of  DNA attached to fluorescent labels or tags.  The tags bind to specific chromosomes in the cell. Once the chromosomes are labelled, the signals are read under a fluorescent microscope so that the number and type of chromosomes present in that cell can be determined. Under the fluorescent microscope the tags look like brightly colored light signals.  Each type of chromosome is labeled with a different color, allowing the embryologist to count the number and type of chromosomes present in that cell.  The analysis takes approximately 1 day to complete. Embryos found to be normal are then transferred to the patient’s uterus on day 4 or 5 after egg retrieval.  Due to the small size of the embryonic cell and the limited window of time in which to obtain a diagnosis, only eight of the 24 types of chromosomes can be analyzed. The chromosomes most commonly analyzed are 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y (ie, the chromosomes thought to be responsible for most first trimester miscarriages).

 

results

The use of PGD to detect aneuploidy can reduce a woman’s chance of having a miscarriage. In a group of patients undergoing IVF, there was a significant decrease in the rate of miscarriages in the group that underwent PGD for aneuploidy compared with the group that underwent IVF without PGD (9% versus 23%, respectively), along with a subsequent higher ongoing pregnancy and delivery rate in the PGD group.

            The rate of chromosomally abnormal pregnancies is also significantly reduced by PGD. In addition, PGD for aneuploidy in patients undergoing IVF may improve the chance of pregnancy by increasing embryo implantation rates (the chance that a single embryo will become a pregnancy) . It is thought that PGD improves the process of selecting embryos for transfer, allowing embryologists to choose embryos most likely to result in a normal pregnancy. By improving embryo selection and reducing the number of embryos transferred, PGD can also help to decrease the frequency of high-order multiple births after IVF.

risks and limitations

The risks of PGD include the possibility that the embryo will be damaged during the biopsy procedure. The current risk of embryo damage at the Saint Barnabas is 0.9%, and depends on the experience and skill of the technician performing the biopsy.  The damage appears to cause the embryo to stop developing, but does not appear to increase the rate of birth defects.

            Because PGD for aneuploidy is currently limited to eight of the 24 types of chromosomes, an embryo that is deemed normal by PGD could have an abnormality in one of the 16 remaining types of chromosomes that were not analyzed by PGD. In addition, because the analysis is performed using FISH, the only abnormalities that can be detected are those of chromosome number. Therefore, other types of abnormalities (ie, chromosome rearrangements, small abnormalities) may not be detected as they would be with karyotyping, chorionic villus sampling (CVS), or amniocentesis. As only a single cell is analyzed, mosaicism cannot be detected. A mosaic embryo does not have the same chromosomal component for all cells, so that a single cell does not reflect the karyotype of the entire embryo. Because of these limitations, the error rate for the chromosomes analyzed (including mosaics and false-positive/false-negative results) is approximately 7% at Saint Barnabas, while the error rate for CVS and amniocentesis is typically less than 1%. Thus, PGD cannot be considered a substitute for prenatal diagnosis.  While a patient may not want to undergo CVS or amniocentesis for other reasons, she should not decline this testing just because PGD was done.  PGD is not equivalent to CVS or amniocentesis and cannot be used as a substitute.  At this time, it is recommended that patients at high risk for chromosomal abnormalities undergo CVS or amniocentesis even if PGD has been performed.

 

Recurrent First-trimester Pregnancy Loss

Recurrent pregnancy loss (defined as three or more miscarriages in a row) affects approximately 1% of the US population. The evaluation of these patients should first rule out genetic, anatomic, endocrine, and immunologic causes for recurrent miscarriage. Many doctors will also test for genetic blood clotting disorders, although this remains controversial. The medical evaluation recurrent miscarriage should be individualized, but typically includes a physical examination; pelvic ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography, or saline hysterosonography to evaluate the uterus; complete blood cell count; testing for thyrotropin, antithyroid antibodies, prolactin, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and antiphosphatidylserine antibodies; karyotyping (chromosomal analysis) of both partners; and possibly an endometrial biopsy (biopsy of the lining of the uterus) and screening for genetic blood clotting disorders.

            Approximately 5% to 8% of couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss have an abnormal karyotype, usually a balanced translocation. A balanced translocation is a rearrangement of chromosomes in an otherwise normal person that markedly increases that persons risk of producing abnormal eggs or sperm, leading to an increased risk for miscarriage and birth defects.  PGD can be performed for couples with a balanced translocation, allowing them to implant only chromosomally balanced embryos, thus reducing their risk of miscarriage. The use of PGD for translocations is technically more complicated than for aneuploidy. Patients with a translocation should be referred to a genetics counselor to review their options. A referral for PGD at a center with experience in this type of analysis can then be made if the couple desires it.

            Even after undergoing a complete work-up, many couples have no identifiable cause for their miscarriages, and therefore no standard treatment options. Without treatment, couples with recurrent miscarriage have a 55% to 70% chance of a successful live birth, depending on how many miscarriages they have had and whether they have any previous normal full-term pregnancies. Thus, expectant management with close follow-up (no treatment or intervention) is a reasonable option for these patients. For couples desiring a more aggressive approach, PGD may be offered for significant reduction (by more than 50%) of the risk of first-trimester miscarriage due to an abnormal number of chromosomes.

History of Chromosomally Abnormal Child or Pregnancy

For patients with a previous child or pregnancy with a chromosomal abnormality, PGD can reduce the risk of certain abnormalities in the patient’s next pregnancy. This may be an attractive alternative to CVS or amniocentesis for some people, as they may be able to avoid termination of an abnormal pregnancy.

Advanced Maternal Age

As a woman ages, her risk for both miscarriage and aneuploid pregnancy increases markedly. For women aged 37 years and older undergoing IVF, the author’s center has demonstrated that PGD for aneuploidy significantly improves pregnancy rates, reduces miscarriage rates, and decreases the chance of a chromosomally abnormal pregnancy if six or more embryos of good quality are available for analysis.

CONCLUSION

The availability of PGD for aneuploidy is increasing quickly at IVF centers around the country.  Saint Barnabas is a world leader in the PGD technique and research and has a proven success rate.  To undergo PGD, patients must conceive via IVF.  PGD should be considered as a reasonable option for patients who have a history of repeated first-trimester miscarriages that are due to a chromosomal abnormality or are unexplained.  The use of PGD can significantly reduce the risk of miscarriage in these patients.  PGD can also decrease the increased risk of miscarriage due to maternal age over 37.  If a patient wants to consider PGD she should have a consultation with our genetics counselor for a more extensive discussion of the procedure and its limitations.  While PGD can have significant benefits, it is a limited genetic test, and is not a substitute for CVS or amniocentesis.

For further information about preimplantation genetic diagnosis - PGD, please contact the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science at (973) 322-8286.  

back